Composition and a fruit Club…
Composition of a model railway is something I discuss at length in the first two of my books, ‘Small Layot Design: Handbook’ and ‘The Art of Railway Modelling’. It is not a paint by numbers approach, nor just a minimalist method - I suppose in a sentence, it’s a set of deliberate decisions about what to include (and what to leave out) to tell your story…
That isn’t to say there aren’t some ‘rules’ or concepts about what works and what doesn’t - just that they can’t be applied in isolation.
I was taking a photo on Paxton Road recently and to improve the angle I removed the tree, that sits stage left at the front - this was always removable for this purpose. This series of photos show just how much of an impact that tree has on the overall composition.
In some ways it breaks the traditional rules, placing it at the front, in the shadow, but I wanted it as part of my story, imagining myself leaning against its gnarled trunk eating sandwiches and a fruit Club. It does more though, it softens the exit and makes the rather contrived road bridge somehow more acceptable.
Without it, too, the scene feels a little unbalanced, the height and visual mass of the cement silo becoming a touch too dominant in the small space. I suppose in a mechanistic sense it may be described as a view block, to disguise the exit - but how many of us would have considered the bridge to hide the exit alone? I think I might have done… its presence is the story. Its benefit a bonus - and a lesson learnt for future projects. Until next time, more soon…
Support my work
I love writing and creating material for the blog. If you enjoy what you read and engage with I would be appreciative of any donation, large or small, to help me keep it advert and restriction free. Alternatively, feel free to buy me a coffee.




Morning James. The tree definitely balances the scene in my opinion, didn't it get it's own page in your book on the art of railway modelling? I'm probably biased as I'm a fan of rural railways. Trees often seem to transform an otherwise neutral scene. Compendium 4 arrived yesterday, cheered up an endlessly rainy day. Have a good weekend.
ReplyDeleteI think you’re right, it does in ‘The Art…’ glad Compendium arrived safely, mixed weather here today but brighter.
DeleteDefinitely better with the tree. When it's not there the one at the back does add a bit of balance but not as much.
ReplyDeleteI think the exit is also better with it - when it's there I see a tree, when it's not I see track heading under a bridge that I know doesn't go anywhere. Hope that makes sense...
Thank you Ian.
DeleteHi James
ReplyDeleteI agree with others it looks much better with the tree in front of the bridge.
I am always a little surprised trees do not get used more to disguise layout exits. A dense group of trees with dense understorey is almost impossible to see though in real life and makes a very effective view block in model form which does not require a bridge or a tunnel to hide a train.
Best regards
Alan
Yes Alan, I think my point today was I hadn’t realised quite how much of a difference it made - it was placed with a story in mind, but actually, is an important part of the composition.
DeleteTrying to share your work with the Czech modellers' community, I am not sure whether I am sufficiently emphasizing its scenographic aspect. However, I think those two photos—the one without the tree and the one with it—explain the whole thing much more accurately and concisely than the amount of internet space I have written up so far.
ReplyDeleteThat is very kind - sometimes a photo explains more than many words could do, this whole post was really by chance, because I wanted to take a photo on the layout from a different angle so removed the tree…
Delete