Beyond Coalbridge Street…
Coalbridge Street was always conceived as the small yard terminus of the Wantage Terminal Company, but quite where Ballard or Wantage were located was deliberately obscure. In recent months I’ve studied maps of New England and talked at length with good friend Chris as we piece together the clues to where this characterful shortline existed…
If you study a map of Northern New Hampshire you’ll find the mill town of Berlin, and the Boston and Maine served the town via a line across northern New Hampshire via a town called Jefferson. Roughly half way between Berlin and Jefferson can be found the small village of Ballard, where the Wantage Terminal plied it’s trade, serving the small town of Wantage and connecting its people and industry to the rest of the country via those two iron ribbons.
Of course we know that even in the 1940s the Wantage Terminal was on borrowed time, and by the late 60s the original company folded. The line was bought by a local Co-operative who incorporated the Ballard and Wantage in 1973. Early days saw the aging WTCo 45t supplemented by a 44t on hire from Pinsly. Late that year, with traffic almost non-existent the Co-op sold the line to Hilton Mears.
In 1974 a paper mill was opened in Wantage and the B&W became an important link in the supply of pulp wood and shipping of finished materials. Meanwhile, the B&M were trying to abandon little used and expensive branch lines across New Hampshire. The B&W, buoyed by the increasing traffic from the new paper mill aquired the line from Berlin to Ballard and over night went from operating a few miles of light weight road side tramway to a shortline operator with over 30 miles of track, bridges and right of way to maintain… this marked the arrival of the trio of ex-New Haven RS1s and a period of Alco ownership that was only broken by the arrival of an ex-Milwaukee Road EMD SW1 in 1985.
This back story, open to further adjustment on my whim, explains the location, the traffic and the roster.
What though of the line itself?
Thoughts turned to modelling other parts of the branch - perhaps the B&M interchange?
It occurred to me that I could use the same two turnout plan - and produce a similar sized module/cameo box as Coalbridge Street itself…
Then I wondered what about recreating the original part of the trilogy, Pont-y-dulais. Inspired by the Claremont and Concord a second module could represent Ballard Road, where the Wantage Terminal had its ‘car barn’ (engine shed). The same two turnout plan again, I’m imagining some old equipment rotting in the head-shunt and the 45t and 44t calling the shed home.
Beyond a series of individual cameos I wondered about how they could be displayed and operated as a series of locations… How the real railway could be enjoyed and recreated, imagining the whole run, bringing cars down from the B&M interchange to the yard at Coalbridge Street, sharing the prototype and its operation with friends.
Coalbridge Street is on the road this year, with appearances at Larkrail and Uckfield in the diary. If you’d like to co-opt part of this history, to build your own part of the branch, go ahead, enjoy what Chris and I have started and do let me know how you get on! Until next time, more soon…
Support my work
I love writing and creating material for the blog. If you enjoy what you read and engage with I would be appreciative of any donation, large or small, to help me keep it advert and restriction free. Alternatively, feel free to buy me a coffee, where regular memberships start from just £1.

Hi James
ReplyDeleteInteresting thoughts on developing your cameo.
Since I have B&W #1000 on hire I will take some photos of it switching the pulp/paperboard mill on my layout. Could be a stand in for the "new" papermill at Wantage!!. Providing I do not include anything too Washington state it might work.
Thinking you could change the Wantage flour mill load shed to the paper mill load shed and maybe chemical tanks rather than lumber at the other end.
Have a good week end
Best regards
Alan
Alan
You have 1000 in her HMLX days. When Hilton and Mears sold the Ballard and Wantage the RS1s were knackered but the best bits cobbled together produced 1000, which went into the HMLX lease fleet.
DeleteI think it is better to keep my paper mill off stage and out of period for Coalbridge Street. It’s a useful tool in the back story but would spoil the character of the micro.
If I build any more cameos, as sketched above, they’ll be the same fall of 73 time period…
I do look forward to seeing 1000 on her duties at Andrews Lumber!
James, comparing the map to the Ballard cameo, if the road overpass is at the left (west), wouldn't the back track be the B&M mainline? But then that would make for an awkward B&W departure from the scene on the left, so I see why you flipped it.
ReplyDeleteAnd do I assume the perpendicular street to the right of the barn is Ballard Road?
Or am I taking things entirely too literally?
In my mind there is still a bridge off stage right too, just I needed to put one in, to left, to get the feel of the Claremont and Concord, as well as it working, visually, better…
DeleteNever mind, I see it now. I was just over thinking it.
DeleteThe view of Ballard Jct. is looking south (180° from the map), while the view of Ballard Rd. is looking east after the B&W has curved to the south. It all makes sense now.
Thinking in North American terms, this would make a wonderful little model railroad in a small spare bedroom, with each cameo on a different wall, each connected to the next by open road-side running, a la Kenny Hill.
Jim Eager
modelingthejointline.blogspot.com
Thanks Jim, you’ve got it I think, yes it would be a lovely layout I think.
DeleteSome nice individual layout plans there.
ReplyDeleteThanks Mark
DeleteJames, I've been what-if doodling with your three B&W cameos, modifying and adapting them to a hypothetical spare bedroom layout scenario. I'd make surprisingly few changes to enhance operations to my tastes.
ReplyDeleteFirst, at Ballard Jct. I'd add that third back siding shown on the map to allow for more cars to be exchanged and provide a run-around for the B&W crew.
At Ballard Road a run-around could be added along the back instead or in addition. And I would definitely flip the cross-over to run towards the engine shed to clear any equipment stored on the tail and leave it undisturbed.
I would make no changes at Wantage, it's perfect as is. Instead I would be inclined to insert at least one more cameo between Ballard Rd and Wantage to host another customer or two that would require that run-around up the line.
A working interchange, a picturesque shops area, and four active customers with both facing and trailing switches along the roadside line should keep any crew busy for an enjoyable operating session in a small space I would think.
Some possible additional customers suitable for a small New England setting might be:
Delete- Coal / heating oil / LPG dealer, depending on the era being modelled, hoppers, tank cars
- small to medium size light manufacturer, such as a furniture factory, textile factory, boxcars
- dairy products or other food producer/processor, refrigerators
- feed mill / fertiliser dealer, covered hoppers, tank cars, boxcars
- County road salt depot, covered hoppers
- pulp wood load out, feeding that off-line paper mill you mentioned, gondolas, pulp racks
- team track, the universal industry, any car type
Thanks for the thinking Jim. I think there might be a danger to over complicate the scheme. I envisaged a terminal/tramway barely surviving - adding customers may give you switching, but does I fear, somewhat detract from the character…
DeleteI always envisaged Langton’s taking coal and heating oil as well as Road salt, just like LaValley on the Claremont and Concord.
That said, if you build it it’s your railway and I’ll be happy that someone else is getting pleasure out of my musings.
Well, I did say "to my tastes."
ReplyDeleteIn my experience modelling a "barely surviving" rail operation does provide loads of atmosphere and character, but it tends to get old fast because it is so limited in terms of operation. I've seen many a layout like that exquisitely built out to completion, only to be torn down due to lack of further interest. That's fine when it is a cameo that will be operated only occasionally, and one has minimal investment in time, resources and funds in the project, but a larger room-size layout is an entirely different creature. One tends to want more of a return on the more substantial investment, and more operating "play value" from the endeavour. Adding a few more customers need not over complicate the scheme or detract from the character, but it does add variety from one ops session to the next, as not all customers would be switched every time or at the same rate or volume, making each session fresh and non repetitive.
You have a specific point of view in your designs and musings that I enjoy and respect, which is why I keep reading your blog. I have mine as well. Neither is better, they're just different. As you said, when it's your railway build and operate it to satisfy yourself first and always.
Well said.
DeleteThere are plenty of ways to enjoy the hobby…
I hope my approach resonates even if you don’t find yourself agreeing with every decision I make or idea or concept I share.