Do we need more?

This post isn’t about this particular prototype, the humble General Electric 44 tonner. Nor is it about the manufacturers of this model (Bachmann) or the newly announced one (Rapido US), rather it is a more quiet reflection…

A 35 year old tooling, detailed and repainted. Modelu figures and Code 55 track with subtle scenic work create the sense of realism perhaps more than a current standard box fresh model sat on Code 83 would?

In our enjoyment of the hobby embracing many different forms I think one thing we can all agree is that model railways is a large enough home for them all. Whilst many get no further than ‘train sets’ there will be others at the engineering or artful extremes who take things further. In recent times we have seen the mainstream march towards greater fidelity and detail in ready to run models. These improvements go beyond skin deep as well with the result being locomotives and rolling stock that many of us would struggle to create in our own hand.

What flavour do you want? Todays models are expensive because manufactures tell us we need every permutation catered for in a new and extensive tooling suite? Do we? Could we accept compromise for a slightly cheaper but still high quality model? Would that leave space for actual modelling?

So if the quality of the models and rolling stock improves to this new ‘level’ do we ourselves need to raise our standards to match? Where my modified Bachmann model captures the feel of the Claremont and Concord, especially sat on the lightweight Code 55 track, would this be the case if we placed a box fresh Rapido equivalent on some Peco Code 83 with coarse and unsophisticated scenic treatment? As manufacturers (and I can count myself in that sentence) we need to convince you that new and high detail is good and is what you need but as a result are we at risk of loosing the sense of balance in our modelling? When the trains look so good the only way to do them justice is museum quality scenery and structures, do we buy these too, perpetuating the train set rather than the modeller?

In addition, bringing the Victory to market has helped me understand where the costs lie in a ready to run project. These are essentially kits assembled in China. We could have included the GWR modifications, the Lambton and original high cab version as well as replacement steel buffer beams. We chose instead to deliver a high quality ‘standard’ offering that would be suit the majority of people and then develop kits for the variations. This meant we could produce a relatively short run for a modest cost.

All that said, perhaps I need not worry. The modellers, dare I say artists amongst us will always find our own path. Which way do you choose? How do you blend today’s quality offerings with your own hand? Perhaps it’s just weathering, perhaps it is still stripping things down and repainting like you’ve always done… Perhaps it has even encouraged you to raise your standards in other elements of the hobby?

Until next time, more soon…