Small Layout Success (Part Two)...
In the first part of this series, Chris and I began to look at what makes a great small layout and gave some thoughts and reflections from our own thinking and experience as to how to make important decisions that materially impact the success of your own project...
Suggested principes of small layout success:
• Deliberate scene composition
• Consistent colour, both temperature and palette
• Theatrical style viewing window
In that first introduction we focused on scene composition - both from a visual and operational viewpoint. Today's blog considers the use of colour... I’ll let Chris begin...
There I was wandering down a tangent, ironically transposing the concept of time travel in a tangible form and here I am realising that we discussed other things. Where we might use colour to support our story of how a warm summer day might look I think it affects how we navigate the scene. Looking at something we start to measure it and relationships between the parts of the whole by relating points. Just as the vivid colours of our summer's day echo our story I think they also represent data to be interpreted in a number of ways.
Because we live in a time where most of us are disconnected from the moments our railways lived in we depend on the story others record to enrich our understanding. In this context colour is a function of mood. If I think about the colour of coal it's hard to not also think about the feel of coal. Even though we're consuming it to create warmth, somehow it still always feels damp and cold. As design elements should we draw from a palette that feels the same way so our coal belt cameo feels right when we look at it? Should the lines that differentiate between the home and the mine be blurred by the way coal dust hangs in the air and tempers the appearance of everything and everyone? The way it gets into our skin and can't be easily washed out. By blurring these lines it's harder to tell where the house ends and the mine begins which might also echo that sense of connectivity or codependancy within the story of one life. Further, even in the limited space, this line that wanders ambiguously toward distortion asks us to not divide the components of our model scene into distinct parts we can visually measure but leaves us always with the outer extremes of its size; maybe no matter how small the scene always feels large when looking at it.
In my childhood I quite vividly remember saving up my weekly pocket money and looking forward to the Saturday trip in to Chester with Mum, Dad and my two brothers. We went our separate ways from the car and my first stop was always the model shop 'Arts and Crafts', every week, eagerly checking for a new copy of the Railway Modeller, un-aware in those days of the magazines publishing schedule!
The excitement of a fresh issue...
I promised I would stay focussed and then here I am but "the excitement of a fresh issue" reminds me of my daily, weekly, regular trip to Tweel's on the corner of University and Kent streets in Charlottetown. While my early childhood in Ottawa had already introduced me to Model Railroader it was Tweel's who sold me my first copy of Railroad Model Craftsman. In today's richly connected world it's hard to remember or imagine a time when connection between ourselves and model railroading was singular and only between the covers of that magazine. Not just articles connecting us to their authors, other people like me, but pages of ad's showing models themselves as unimaginable. Imagine a layout in HOn3, whatever that is, or owning a GG1 to pull, I guess, passenger trains? Tweels and Arts and Crafts become like a charging station for our imaginations. Sorry James, I wandered.
I remember thumbing through and absorbing the greyscale imagery before diving into the articles at home. Often the layouts would look wonderfully realistic in a way my own didn't, with it's juvenile use of materials and colour... however often when reaching the 'colour supplement' pages I would be let down by the same layouts lurid greens and bright tones clashing, totally destroying that vision of reality imparted from a view in greyscale. Of course back then photography and colour reproduction in the modelling magazines wasn't great, but there were exceptions, so it wasn't a universal disappointment.
The few books on "real" railroads that I had all featured black and white photos. Even the magazines were often black and white too. As tools defining an understanding of the real world we are left reconciling the colours and textures of our model railway knowing that they just never looked like the ones outside and that third voice coming from our friend in the magazine who was doing it different. I don't have answers but I do wonder how we could be having a conversation about colour choices? Model railroaders launch into petty feuds over the "right" shade of Boxcar Red but I wonder how anyone can take a side in that when there was so much variety in chemical formula, time travel is still impossible so we have no first hand experience, and our photos and films of that time are degraded by time itself? If all my photos of the Sandy River's boxcars are black and white how can I measure the right shade of red? If that film takes on a yellow tinge as it ages how do I know green the grass is? How does our archive of appearance data affect our measure of what looks right? In a conversation about colour I tangent into a monologue on "this" being another place where we earn our identities as artists practicing the craft of our hobby by making aesthetic decisions about the presentation of our work and how we describe the choices me made and why we made them.
In reality, we don’t just see our layouts in greyscale and so with small layouts, where the eye can take in the whole scene in a very short period, the choice of colour temperature and palette becomes absolutely critical. In terms of that 'feeling of space' and the emotional connection to the wide open sky I talked about with my Prince Edward Island cameo, Kinross, it would be easy and simplistic to assume that small layouts need to utilise a pale, light and hence airy palette to be successful. I’ve a suspicion that although this can work, it isn't an exclusive truth.
Instead, I believe the key is both a consistent colour temperature, and a restricted and muted palette.
If we don't use a blend of elements within the scene can we instead lower its intensity back to where it came from? James mentioned Kinross and I wondered if we could merge the colour of the sky into the colour of the large Visser's warehouse? The colour of sky creates the colour of water in real life and changes our impression of the colour of everything in real life. Can we leverage the same power? What if, instead of painting the whole structure one "correct" colour we determined it's strongest corner, that defining one, and then as we move back from that prominent point we faded the colour back toward that of the sky? So that even though the physical form of the building remains it's presence is muted as it fades away from the viewer.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for leaving a comment on my blog - I appreciate you taking the time to share your views. If you struggle to log in, please turn off the ‘block cross-site tracking’ setting in your browser.
James.