Saint Blazey and King Coal: Sheds in small spaces…

“Modern locomotives are too big for micro layouts. Modern locomotives on modern prototypes, todays railways are boring, no shunting, modern layouts are all diesel depots”. Against this backdrop of perceptions from the hobby in general I began trawling my collection of rail freight books for inspiration to use the forthcoming Accurascale and Revolution Class 66s…

What follows is not ground breaking, the results will perhaps just mildly tempt you to do further digging and for myself, the plan is still to build Albion Yard (Modern Goods from this post). With that said, it is interesting to consider the effects of photography of the prototype be our modelling. Where a long telephoto shot can compress distance we have only our composition. That said, the feelings such a photograph can evoke within us could be channelled into one or similar schemes.


The bulk of these large locomotives can be exploited. In our modelling we can use them to fill a scene, to make a layout feel even more intimate. In small layouts our only constraint is train length, yet finding prototypes that give us both short trains and compact intimate settings is a real challenge. To contrast two approaches King Coal considers longer trains and a modicum of operation all driven from that photograph by Paul Shannon (top right) where the telephoto compression has made things feel modellable. 


St. Blazey on the other hand has been somewhat butchered and used as pure inspiration rather than a nuts and bolts build. I’ve taken the character of the scene infront of the wagon repair depot and the tight confines of parts of the short branch to Par harbour and combined them giving us snatched moments of train movement where the bulk of the 66 is in sharp contrast with the CDA wagons and steam era infrastructure.


The wagon repair depot (something we’ve looked at before) offers the greatest potential for interesting operation in today’s modern railway. The EWS facility at Toton is another (perhaps obvious) setting where through careful reorganisation and balance a great cameo could be crafted. You all know the real railway as well as I do though, where else should we / could we look for intimate spaces that these mundane but massive locomotives work? I look forward to hearing from you. In the meantime, have a good weekend! More soon…



Donate
I love writing and creating material for the blog. If you enjoy what you read and engage with I would be appreciative of any donation, large or small, to help me keep it advert and restriction free.

Comments

  1. I do wonder what the potential is for 'too long' trains on a micro layout. Where the train length barely clears the fiddle yard at each end, back and forth into sidings presumed in each, splitting train length to run around a smaller loop as in the prototype.

    ReplyDelete
  2. On a single-ended micro you could do away with locomotives altogether and have a prototypical raft of wagons pulling backwards and forwards from siding to fiddle yard using a powered chassis

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This would do away with the raison d’etre of the scheme though - the lead actor being the omnipresent and reliable EMD 66!

      Delete
  3. Hi James

    Another possible prototype might be the stone quarries around Frome, Somerset. After all the rail traffic from there to London and other depots was the reason for the design of the Class 66 and Foster Yeoman/ARC purchased the first of these Angelized SD40-2 . As I remember the operations I saw the plant switcher, which was an SW1001 and previously 08's, would haul a short rake from the loader and then the Class66 or the switcher would build the train. At Merehead there was a convenient road bridge and a Whatley a tunnel and a bridge to act as scene breaks. There were also loco facilities for the company switchers and the 66's

    Hope you are feeling better

    Best regards
    Alan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah Alan, you're referring to the Foster Yeoman Class 59, I pestered my parents to drive past Merehead once and al I could see from the road bridge was lines of wagons and the SW1001. The rakes were LONG and made of space eating bogie wagons - and the locomotive is similar, and yes, the reliable forerunner of the Class 66 (which EWS ordered in 1996 that used SD70 primer mover and different trucks and geared for 75mph).

      I am feeling a little better thank you, but not on top form.

      Delete
  4. Note for my future self - other 66 ideas:
    - Bescot (with lines of wagons as backdrop)
    - Parkandillick branch (China clay)
    - Toronto wagon repair depot
    - Thurso (!!)
    - Didcot yard (steam centre at back)
    - Toton wagon repair depot

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi James

    Well that shows I don't know much about the current British mainline scene. Obviously I can't tell the difference between a class 59 and a class 66. In my defence I have never been too enthusiastic about mainline railways but I do know the difference between an SW1500 and an SW1001

    When I visited Merehead back in 1981 they were using the SW1001 with rakes of non-bogie wagons

    Best regards

    Alan

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for leaving a comment on my blog - I appreciate you taking the time to share your views. If you struggle to log in, please turn off the ‘block cross-site tracking’ setting in your browser.

James.